| From | Message |
dan
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
1/28/2006
22:30:43
|
 Subject: '99 5.9 vs. 5.9 rt
IP: Logged
Message:
what is the difference between the 5.9 and the 5.9 r/t? Is there a differece?
|
novaDAK
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
1/29/2006
19:17:19
| RE: '99 5.9 vs. 5.9 rt
IP: Logged
Message:
same engine, but different exhaust system which gave it the extra 5hp over the regular 5.9
|
REDSUV
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
2/02/2006
21:22:41
| RE: '99 5.9 vs. 5.9 rt
IP: Logged
Message:
The R/T has a 3.92 ratio compared to the 3.55 in the non R/T. Better take-off, worse highway mileage.
|
bob gnat
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
2/04/2006
18:39:15
| RE: '99 5.9 vs. 5.9 rt
IP: Logged
Message:
Don't forget the better flowing heads on the R/T with bigger valves (very desirable heads for magnum engines).
|
Mopar318
GenII
2/05/2006
20:32:16
| RE: '99 5.9 vs. 5.9 rt
IP: Logged
Message:
"Don't forget the better flowing heads on the R/T with bigger valves (very desirable heads for magnum engines)."
That was complete BS. The 5.9 only came in the R/T and some later model quad cab dakotas and the R/T does not have different heads. The R/T came standard with performance suspension, 3.92 LSD, 17X9" rims, and performance exhaust.
My rice eater
|
| | P 1 |
|
Post a reply to this message:
Username Registration: Optional
All visitors are allowed to post messages
|
