| From | Message |
tchandler
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
12/25/2003
22:25:42
|
 Subject: 318 VS VS 287 (4.7)
IP: Logged
Message:
I had a 1995 dak w/5.2 in it and recently got a 2000 w/4.7. I have to tell u, the 4.7 kicks butt. It feels like it has 10 times the power. And the way it is geared, it would have smoked my 318 in ANY race.
|
Who gives
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
12/25/2003
22:34:17
|  RE: 318 VS VS 287 (4.7)
IP: Logged
Message:
A Sh1t, glad your happy, BTW the SRT 4 will smoke your 4.7 in any race !
|
so what
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
12/25/2003
23:38:28
| RE: 318 VS VS 287 (4.7)
IP: Logged
Message:
enter that fukkin FWD piece of sh!t in a burnout contest once. The dak will be roasting its second set of tires as you are replacing your cv joints, transaxle, axle shafts, or clutch. may not be a race, but it wont hang in a burnout contest. who wants a fukkin neon anyways? srt-4 neon. both ugly, both gay. In the words of Happy Gilmore....gold jacket green jacket, who gives a sh!t!!!!!
|
gen1dak
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
12/26/2003
00:20:48
| RE: 318 VS VS 287 (4.7)
IP: Logged
Message:
A match-up with the '92 vintage 318 would be better. The cams and exhaust were "tamed" a bit from sometime in '93 on. As for smokin' 8's, don't forget the even smaller 273 from way back. From the factory with 6 grand redline and it'd bury it at will. Ahhhh, the sixties.
|
MaxDAK13
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
12/26/2003
01:16:17
| RE: 318 VS VS 287 (4.7)
IP: Logged
Message:
This is a truck site, not a car site, no ones cares if you can beat it in a race, my Mercedes CLK55 AMG would smoke most people on this site, but thats not a race because trucks and cars are usually not comparable, now if you had an SRT 10, then you could talk crap, but you dont, so go to the neon site, thank you
|
Love it
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
12/26/2003
09:02:17
| RE: 318 VS VS 287 (4.7)
IP: Logged
Message:
This is a truck site, not a car site, no one cares if you can beat it in a race. So take your cyber world CLK 55 back to fantasy land, have a nice trip.
BTW post some pics of your fantasy car!
|
Mark
Forum Moderator
12/26/2003
11:08:28
| RE: 318 VS VS 287 (4.7)
IP: Logged
Message:
I drove a CLK430 around Pateson NJ for a bit. Quick car. The CLK55 has another 100hp. I could only imagine. All the street walking young ladies kept trying to look in to see who was driving.
-Mark Hryckiewicz
1993 Sport RC SB 5.2L Auto
Mark.DodgeDakotas.com
|
teamfast
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
12/26/2003
11:31:17
| RE: 318 VS VS 287 (4.7)
IP: Logged
Message:
you mean the "hookers" Mark? LOL
|
gen1dak
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
12/26/2003
20:15:43
| RE: 318 VS VS 287 (4.7)
IP: Logged
Message:
MaxDAK13? I suppose your comment was aimed at me. Hmmm, now lemme see. This is a truck site. Yeah, and how are they different from cars? Aside from the obvious, hmm, could it be the engine? Nope. transmission? Ahhh, nope. Rear axle. Gotta be the rear. WRONG! Gee, I guess it's just beyond me. Glad to see we have people like you around to point these things out. And to think they say there's no advantage to have matching shoe sizes and IQs.
|
gen1dak
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
12/26/2003
20:21:13
| RE: 318 VS VS 287 (4.7)
IP: Logged
Message:
Oh, and Max? If you really want to be pissy about it....This is a site about Dodge Dakotas.....not Mercedes.
|
01Motorsport
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
12/27/2003
22:57:17
| RE: 318 VS VS 287 (4.7)
IP: Logged
Message:
Uh-oh..Mercedes owns Dodge, now! Anyway, variety is the spice of life. Speak softly and carry a big Mopar stick.
|
gen1dak
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
12/28/2003
21:47:26
| RE: 318 VS VS 287 (4.7)
IP: Logged
Message:
Actually, Daimler-Benz AG produced the Mercedes line. Now, Daimler Chrysler AG owns both.
|
midnightmagic
GenIII
12/28/2003
22:30:41
| RE: 318 VS VS 287 (4.7)
IP: Logged
Message:
id race any srt-4, each of us towing 2000lbs. we'll see who wins that one
You gotta ask yourself one question...That Thing Got A HEMI???
|
| | P 1 |
|
Post a reply to this message:
Username Registration: Optional
All visitors are allowed to post messages
|
