| From | Message |
DucBoy
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
7/31/2002
11:46:22
|
 Subject: JBA vs Gibson Headers
IP: Logged
Message:
OK,
I am now looking at some new headers to go with my 2000 4.7L. I already have a fastman 68mm TB and a giboson split rear cat back, intense performance air intake. My dilemma is JBA or Gibson headers. Any pros or cons to using JBA with a gibson Catback? Gibson says their headers are "tuned" for their exhaust. However in a couple years I'll probably go supercharger with true dual flowmasters. thoughts on the headers?
|
kota on 20s
GenIII
7/31/2002
17:49:55
| RE: JBA vs Gibson Headers
IP: Logged
Message:
im sure you will get about the same amout of power, which on the 4.7 is almost nothing
i dont have a 4.7, but i have heard that the stock manifolds on thoes are really good. you might want to save your money
Eric, 98 5.2 5speed, K&N gen II, 50mm TB, 2bbl M-1, 1.7RR's, JBA ciramic headers, carsound cat, dumped gibson, and a lot more
|
Paco
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
2/06/2003
06:10:57
| RE: JBA vs Gibson Headers
IP: Logged
Message:
I just read one of the previous chats and wondered the same question: I have a 5.7 ltr Denali, w/ exhaust,intake,spacer,pullys,& hypertech reprogrammer & was going for either GIBSON OR JBA stainless steel headers-
WHICH SHOULD I GO FOR ??????
|
CThomp
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
2/06/2003
08:02:54
| RE: JBA vs Gibson Headers
IP: Logged
Message:
Kota is right. From what I understand you should only get headers for the 4.7L if you plan on going to forced induction. Then you'll get some power out of them. Otherwise you'll be spending $400-$600 on looks.
|
| | P 1 |
|
Post a reply to this message:
Username Registration: Optional
All visitors are allowed to post messages
|
