Dodge Dakota ForumDodge Dakota PhotosDodgeDakota.net Membership
  Forums   Forum Tools
07:16:11 - 03/29/2024

V6 Dakotas
FromMessage
dodgeboy
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


5/10/2004
22:24:29

Subject: RE: is this true?
IP: Logged

Message:
Daiy driver now,2.5L turbo one

still not as easy to work on as the dak



IntenseDak39
*GenIII*
 User Profile


5/10/2004
22:38:33

RE: is this true?
IP: Logged

Message:
that 2.5 is a lot easier to maintian though!

man, this may seem funny but i want to get a early 80's aires station wagon and drop in a 300 hp super 60 turbo 2.2 in it. Man would that be bad news for some vettes out there!

6.6 Lt. Big Block, 727 TF shift kit, 452 heads, edelbrock 750 cfm, .513/.513 284/300 crower cam, comp cams springs, comp cams pushrods, 1.5 roller rockers, dp intake, mopar ignition, mopar windage tray, dual exhaust w/ 40 series flowmasters, 4.10 gears, coilover drag suspension, approx, 3500 lbs

another mark
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


5/10/2004
23:46:56

RE: is this true?
IP: Logged

Message:
If I was driving a Vette I'd find it more embarassing to get beat by an A100.



dodgeboy
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


5/11/2004
06:20:57

RE: is this true?
IP: Logged

Message:
ummm, whats that have to do with any thing?

there is a reliant wagon running around on the net with a turbo III motor in it. That super 60 package is crap now, alot better sh!t available now.



dodgeboy
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


5/11/2004
06:23:05

RE: is this true?
IP: Logged

Message:
haha, guess I should read everything before I reply.

I think a reliant wagon would be wayyy worse than a a100.....



  <<Oringinal Post <<Previous Page P 2


Post a reply to this message:

Username Registration: Optional
All visitors are allowed to post messages


Name:
Email:
Notify me when I get a reply to my message:Yes  No

Icons:            

          

Subject:
Message:
 



Home | Forums | Members | Pictures | Contact Us

This site is in no way affiliated with Chrysler or any of its subsidiaries.