Dodge Dakota ForumDodge Dakota PhotosDodgeDakota.net Membership
  Forums   Forum Tools
14:36:51 - 04/19/2024

V6 Dakotas
FromMessage
JD
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


3/15/2004
21:04:29

Subject: 3.9 liter vs 3.9 mag
IP: Logged

Message:
I was thinking on buying a dakota what years are the 3.9 liter and 3.9 mag and what are the HP and TQ for the two and what do they run in 1/4 mile I have a chevy now had a ford ranger broke two much and I am looking for a second truck so I am looking at dakotas trying to stay with american trucks



IntenseDak39
*GenIII*
 User Profile


3/15/2004
21:11:34

RE: 3.9 liter vs 3.9 mag
IP: Logged

Message:
87-91 non mag... 125 hp
92-03 magnum.... 175 hp 225 tq

93 had 180 hp though



JD
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


3/15/2004
21:36:16

RE: 3.9 liter vs 3.9 mag
IP: Logged

Message:
I am going to buy one for sure just wasnt sure what year to go for I,ll go for the 92 thanks intensedak39



IntenseDak39
*GenIII*
 User Profile


3/15/2004
21:54:57

RE: 3.9 liter vs 3.9 mag
IP: Logged

Message:
ne time



blue92
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

3/16/2004
03:04:36

RE: 3.9 liter vs 3.9 mag
IP: Logged

Message:
I think you will be pleased.



MY H3RO
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

3/16/2004
09:01:00

RE: 3.9 liter vs 3.9 mag
IP: Logged

Message:
I have a 2003 3.9 "Magnum" I can't believe they can use that term for this dog.



xmr
GenIII
 Email User Profile


3/16/2004
10:59:32

RE: 3.9 liter vs 3.9 mag
IP: Logged

Message:
H3ro
its only a dog if you don't pet it. You would be amazed at what a screamer it can be with a few mods.

'98 cc auto /Home brew cold air with K&N,Dynomax, Superchip Tuner, 1.7 RR,, F&B tb. NAPA cap and rotor, 3923 plugs,relocated iat, 180 t'stat, Crankshaft sensor mod.

Alex.
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

3/16/2004
17:34:01

RE: 3.9 liter vs 3.9 mag
IP: Logged

Message:
i was think sucj i get a 95 4x4 dodge dakota 3.9 mag engine. does is pill hardcore and will it bet a chevy



MY H3RO
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

3/16/2004
17:57:47

RE: 3.9 liter vs 3.9 mag
IP: Logged

Message:
ALEX

What the F did you just write??????????



Alex.T
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

3/16/2004
18:05:37

RE: 3.9 liter vs 3.9 mag
IP: Logged

Message:
sorry about that i messed up. i am think of getting a 95 dodge dakota 4x4 V6 magnum and its standard . i was wondering if its good for mud bogging and if it has guts (power) e mail me please give me some help aco4dre@hotmail.com



J and J Auto
GenII
 Email User Profile


3/17/2004
09:58:51

RE: 3.9 liter vs 3.9 mag
IP: Logged

Message:
The 3.9 can be a very economical and good
performing motor with just a few simple boltons
and everything working properly.

My 95 4X4 is pulling over 22mpg with a stock 92
motor.

Stroker will be back soon

Larry
J&J Auto

Dennis
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


4/11/2004
00:53:57

RE: 3.9 liter vs 3.9 mag
IP: Logged

Message:
i have a 2003 4x4 3.9 i only get 16.5 miles to the gal. how can i get better.



Gas mileage
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


4/11/2004
13:21:38

RE: 3.9 liter vs 3.9 mag
IP: Logged

Message:
I have a 2001 fullsize Ram 1500, 2WD, 3.9 with 5 speed and I get 18-19 mpg on the average. The best ever was 22 mpg on a trip. The worst was 16 mpg around town in the winter. From my understanding the Dakota with 3.9, 4X4 and automatic weighs about the same as my fullsize p/u so you would think the mileage would be closer than 16.5 on the average. A trick that we used to do in the 1970s during the oil crisis was to advance the timing a little. Even if you have to pay extra for 89 octane this would be worthwhile.



87dakota500
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


4/12/2004
16:22:40

RE: 3.9 liter vs 3.9 mag
IP: Logged

Message:
im surprised the first gen only had 125hp what was the big difference for the 92 and up for HP



mhall02
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

4/12/2004
16:30:27

RE: 3.9 liter vs 3.9 mag
IP: Logged

Message:
They did the first few years with a carb., then throttle body fuel injection up to 1991 (which is what I have). In 1992 they introduced multi port fuel injection and the heads were re-designed = more power. There may be more but these are a few of the differences. Even with at 125 hp mounted to my 5-speed, this truck seems to have decent power, not a race truck but gets me around just fine with no mods.



   P 1


Post a reply to this message:

Username Registration: Optional
All visitors are allowed to post messages


Name:
Email:
Notify me when I get a reply to my message:Yes  No

Icons:            

          

Subject:
Message:
 



Home | Forums | Members | Pictures | Contact Us

This site is in no way affiliated with Chrysler or any of its subsidiaries.