Dodge Dakota ForumDodge Dakota PhotosDodgeDakota.net Membership
  Forums   Forum Tools
06:28:42 - 04/29/2024

V6 Dakotas
FromMessage
Gregg
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


7/08/2005
15:42:23

Subject: New Daks Poll
IP: Logged

Message:
Do you Dak fans think the 2005 design is better eye candy or prefer the older flavor?

Personal opinion, I think the last generation looked sleaker with better lines. Those "projector" headlamps and Euro "Alteza" tail lights are cheese. Maybe they should ship with 20" chrome spinner wheels...bling, bling.

Marketing idiots.



ace
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


7/08/2005
16:23:42

RE: New Daks Poll
IP: Logged

Message:
2005's are ugly



daddio
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


7/08/2005
16:32:32

RE: New Daks Poll
IP: Logged

Message:
i'll keep my '00. they can keep the '05. i just can't get used to that look.



modain
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

7/08/2005
16:47:09

RE: New Daks Poll
IP: Logged

Message:
I hated the new look when I saw it previewed in December, 2002. I still hate it. I'll keep my 2002 QC until it desintegrates.



Joe M.
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


7/08/2005
17:58:04

RE: New Daks Poll
IP: Logged

Message:
i think the new durango's are even uglier!



Mike S.
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


7/08/2005
18:05:16

RE: New Daks Poll
IP: Logged

Message:
They are starting to grow on me but I prefer my 2001. I think they made way to drastic of a change, but to each there own.
Mike S.



marlow
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

7/08/2005
18:25:57

RE: New Daks Poll
IP: Logged

Message:
05's are fugly



bigdave
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


7/08/2005
18:44:49

RE: New Daks Poll
IP: Logged

Message:
HATE EM, They are so ugly I would castrate myself for thinking about buying one.



congo
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


7/08/2005
20:21:10

RE: New Daks Poll
IP: Logged

Message:
i think they are ugly.. i have a 2003 dakota stampede. thats the best looking truck they have out..



01dak
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


7/10/2005
22:31:05

RE: New Daks Poll
IP: Logged

Message:
yeah, the 05's are pretty gay



dakkid
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


7/11/2005
05:13:28

RE: New Daks Poll
IP: Logged

Message:
i don't like the 05, but i admit i did see one that had alot of exterior mods and was pretty sweet looking. it would be the only 05 i would drive, but only if it came like that from the factory. at least they beat the colorado or those honda ridgelines. nothing will ever touch the gen III's when it comes to looks, in my opinion.



Dan M
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

7/11/2005
08:03:58

RE: New Daks Poll
IP: Logged

Message:
the 05 looks better on the taller 4x4s I think. It's kinda growing on me like the older version did.

still happy with my 95.

- Dan M



DakJack
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

7/12/2005
10:10:12

RE: New Daks Poll
IP: Logged

Message:
I think they're ugly but my wife bought one so I can't say it too loud.
The sharp corners and pointy things look stupid. I like the sleek lines of the older models.
I agree that the Durangos look even worse. Too much body work for no reason.



Scotty
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

7/17/2005
12:48:49

RE: New Daks Poll
IP: Logged

Message:
The new Dakota is too BIG!. Why not just buy a Ram.
The new Dakota weighs more and gets poorer fuel mileage than the 72-93 Full size Rams.

The 97-2004 Dakotas are sharp and the right size as far as Length, width, and height, but are way too heavy.

They should have made the new Dakota the same size or a little smaller and cut some fat. In this day of $2.50/ gallon gas. All car manufacturers are going the wrong way. Even the 2005 Tacoma is bigger than the 2004



8banger
GenIII
 User Profile


7/17/2005
20:04:38

RE: New Daks Poll
IP: Logged

Message:
I predict sales for the 05-06 will be way down. I wouldnt buy one.

03 Dakota 4X4 QC SportPlus 4.7L
T-Crank, 2Chamber Flows, K&N Drop-In

93dak4x4
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

7/17/2005
22:31:14

RE: New Daks Poll
IP: Logged

Message:
I'll keep my 93 til the wheels fall off. then once that is complete ill put them back on and drive it some more. the 05's look like crap and its the best truck on the market so...i say just rebuild what ya got til the day they come out with something worth driving.



dakattack98
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

7/17/2005
22:56:39

RE: New Daks Poll
IP: Logged

Message:
THEY ARE REALLY #$%@&*! UGLY. I might consider going rice before I bought the new dak. I love my 98 4x4. I'm going to run the wheels off of it.

Aaron



Just Looking
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


7/18/2005
04:14:25

RE: New Daks Poll
IP: Logged

Message:
I have to agree the new dakotas are fugly.

I seen what most of the manufacturers are coming out with and my dads 1983 ford f250 brick on wheels is coming back into style. Except his gets 13 mpg with a 460 v8 all stock truck to probably hits 14 mpg with exhaust and advanced timing. Might try to trade trucks with him
to save some gas. I still dont believe fuel injection saves gas since my 3.9 QC gets 13 mpg
A family member used to own the old caddy v16 that would get 20 mpg
Go figure...



New Owner
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

7/18/2005
10:05:55

RE: New Daks Poll
IP: Logged

Message:
They aren't too bad once you get past the boxy squared off body lines



hawkmoon
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

7/19/2005
15:03:45

RE: New Daks Poll
IP: Logged

Message:
Yeah, I don't think I'd call the new dakotas ugly, but not as nice as 97-04...the durango on the other hand is the most butt ugly piece of crap on the road, it looks like a bloated Jeep Liberty (another fugly vehicle). I love the hemi and stuff they did with it, but I would never want to be seen in one. Do they poll people before they make these changes or just assume that they can do whatever they want?



nugsfan
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

7/19/2005
20:26:35

RE: New Daks Poll
IP: Logged

Message:
I dont like the new look either but its growing on me "slightly" That new Durango tho should be taken out back and shot. It looks like a pig on wheels. Honestly if the back doors slid it could pass for a minivan. YUK!



   P 1 Next Page>>


 



Home | Forums | Members | Pictures | Contact Us

This site is in no way affiliated with Chrysler or any of its subsidiaries.