Dodge Dakota ForumDodge Dakota PhotosDodgeDakota.net Membership
  Forums   Forum Tools
22:54:09 - 04/26/2024

Dakota Performance
FromMessage
Ray
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

8/26/2003
07:45:54

Subject: '92 headers on a '93 = Performance?
IP: Logged

Message:
Good morning alll,
I just read this >> http://www.sporttruck.com/techarticles/1411/index.html

and have a question about the last paragraph. Is it true what they say? That headers from a 1992 dakota can be installed on a 1993, and give about a 10hp increase? I have a 3.9L extended cab sport.

If this is true, off to the junk yard I go...Unless one of you can sell me performance headers for cheap (slightly used (4-6K miles) or brand new).



Mark
Forum Moderator
 User Profile


8/26/2003
08:38:36

RE: '92 headers on a '93 = Performance?
IP: Logged

Message:
If you mean the exhaust manifold then I'd have to say that the 92's and 93's both have larger inside diameter. I beleve they made them smaller for 94 and up.

-Mark Hryckiewicz
1993 Sport RC SB 5.2L Auto
DodgeDakotas.com

Mark
Forum Moderator
 User Profile


8/26/2003
08:45:52

RE: '92 headers on a '93 = Performance?
IP: Logged

Message:
Wow I just read that article. Great Reading! Nice early morning pickmeup... (intentional pun) I read somewhere else that the 92's as well as 93's have the larger exhaust manifold. One source is wrong, I dont know which one. I can check the part number on my '93 manifold if someone out there can do the same for their '92.

Mark

-Mark Hryckiewicz
1993 Sport RC SB 5.2L Auto
DodgeDakotas.com

rtdkota
R/T
 Email User Profile


8/26/2003
10:16:21

RE: '92 headers on a '93 = Performance?
IP: Logged

Message:
'92 and '93 Dakota are rated at 230 hp, and have the larger diameter exhaust collector.

It's the same for the 5.2L jeeps as well.

I have sold a few of these manifolds---

Good stealth HP move.

Not sure on the 3.9L applications-- believe it's only for the 5.2L

Sam


www.socaldakota.com

1Flamed92Dak
GenII
 User Profile


8/26/2003
15:31:00

RE: '92 headers on a '93 = Performance?
IP: Logged

Message:
Mark good to see you posting again. The 3.9 for 1992 do have the larger exhaust manifolds I also read somewhere that these manifolds flow pretty close to the JBA headers thats why im still running mine the inside diameter is 2 1/2 inches compared to 1 7/8 inches for the 94-2003 then again the 1992 also had 3" exhaust all the way back also.



Ray
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

8/26/2003
18:19:23

RE: '92 headers on a '93 = Performance?
IP: Logged

Message:
yeah...ima see if i can get a hold of some '92 exhaust manifolds. I wont pay much for em...i hope. lol



Mark
Forum Moderator
 User Profile


8/26/2003
21:14:55

RE: '92 headers on a '93 = Performance?
IP: Logged

Message:
Yes I am getting into posting here and there. Lately I've learned a lot about my truck. I'd like to share this info because people have been so helpful to me. There were many times when I was in a bind and I needed some info. I simply brought up the ole DodgeDakotas.com search box and found my answer. Grease all over the keyboard and all. haha

-Mark Hryckiewicz
1993 Sport RC SB 5.2L Auto
DodgeDakotas.com

Ray Kolbe
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

8/27/2003
09:38:11

RE: '92 headers on a '93 = Performance?
IP: Logged

Message:
Where did you get your hood Mark? I want/need one like that. Is that a full new hood, or just a nice scoop?



Mark
Forum Moderator
 User Profile


8/28/2003
13:42:15

RE: '92 headers on a '93 = Performance?
IP: Logged

Message:
I made that hood myself. I got the plastic scoop from summitracing. It's a bond on type with rivots and that green fiberglas bondo junk. Then I repainted the hood. That was 5 years ago. Unfortunately after about two or three the paint started chipping up because I used lacquer over the factory urethane. I chose lacquer because its less toxic and I have use it a lot in the past. A few months ago I got a new hood from AAR. This time I used urethane. Luckilly I'm still alive and the paint looks a lot better. I will have new pictures one day when I get time to wash the beast. The hood you see in the pictures is sitting in my basement.

-Mark Hryckiewicz
1993 Sport RC SB 5.2L Auto
DodgeDakotas.com

B.C.
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


10/04/2003
20:27:43

RE: '92 headers on a '93 = Performance?
IP: Logged

Message:
Mark: Is hood for sale?



Mark
Forum Moderator
 User Profile


10/05/2003
15:11:26

RE: '92 headers on a '93 = Performance?
IP: Logged

Message:
I have the hood sitting in my basement. That picture was taken years ago. I now have an AAR fiberglas hood. The one you see pictured has the paint peeling off. I suppose I would sell it to someone in the NJ area.

-Mark Hryckiewicz
1993 Sport RC SB 5.2L Auto
DodgeDakotas.com

Shinnysideup
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


10/06/2003
20:44:22

RE: '92 headers on a '93 = Performance?
IP: Logged

Message:
The inside diameter of the 92-93 V-8 manifolds is 2 1/8" vs. 1 7/8" for the later. I have a pair on the shelf that have been ground smooth and Jet-Hot coated that will be going into my truck soon along with a new Y-pipe.
If you are looking to buy some look around, I have seen them go for as little as $ 10 a pair, common price at a salvage yard is approx 35 ea.



01Motorsport
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


10/07/2003
09:48:38

RE: '92 headers on a '93 = Performance?
IP: Logged

Message:
Ray has a 3.9.



JOE.C
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


10/07/2003
16:18:48

RE: '92 headers on a '93 = Performance?
IP: Logged

Message:
I got a '95 318. and the headers are deffently restricted, I'm looking for some tubeular headers. Don't really car what brand it is because I know I can at least get 20 extra HP and more toruqe.



blue92
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

10/08/2003
00:27:39

RE: '92 headers on a '93 = Performance?
IP: Logged

Message:
I thought '92 & '93 3.9's were the same. '94s have all of the new sh@t under the hood.



   P 1


Post a reply to this message:

Username Registration: Optional
All visitors are allowed to post messages


Name:
Email:
Notify me when I get a reply to my message:Yes  No

Icons:            

          

Subject:
Message:
 



Home | Forums | Members | Pictures | Contact Us

This site is in no way affiliated with Chrysler or any of its subsidiaries.