| From | Message |
03graphrt
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
11/02/2002
11:44:13
|
 Subject: m1 or flash
IP: Logged
Message:
hey im gone get my tb soon and i will have like 600 left over, should i get the m1 for like 400 and have some1 install it for like 100 or should i get the B&G flash.would it matter if i got the m1 flash first and within like 4 months put the m1 in??
|
dogliftsleg
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
11/03/2002
10:47:01
| RE: m1 or flash
IP: Logged
Message:
doh!
|
SinCity R/T
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
11/03/2002
11:07:28
| RE: m1 or flash
IP: Logged
Message:
If you can get 93 or 94 octane fuel where you live, get the M1 PCM flash now and then work on getting the M1 2bbl installed as soon as you can... You can run fine without it, but it's optimized for the M1's top-end breathing. A few people had the PCM flash done first, then had their M1's installed a few months later with no problems.
If you can't get 93/94 octane fuel, you may want to consider having a flash done inbetween the regular flash and the M1 flash. I can only get 91 octane here in Nevada, and with the elevation and weather conditions, I moderately ping between 1300-1700rpms if I'm just cruising around town. IMHO people who aren't near sea level or can't get 91 octane fuel should get the M1 flash for the higher rpm shift points but get the timing curve closer to the regular flash to avoid pinging issues.
The B&G flash drastically affects the way your vehicle drives in performance conditions. Of course everyone wishes it was cheaper but imho it was worth every penny.
- Steve
|
| | P 1 |
|
Post a reply to this message:
Username Registration: Optional
All visitors are allowed to post messages
|
