| From | Message |
Moe
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
3/02/2006
13:39:27
|
 Subject: Hughes cam
IP: Logged
Message:
Is anyone using a Hughes Engines cam? if so do you like it? Which one do you have? I am considering a Hughes as KRC is more expensive.
|
Mr Knowitall
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
3/02/2006
15:08:48
| RE: Hughes cam
IP: Logged
Message:
it would help if you revealed year and motor size.
|
Moe
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
3/03/2006
06:29:12
| RE: Hughes cam
IP: Logged
Message:
Any Cam - Any motor. I am looking to see if there is general satisfaction with a hughes cam.
|
Mike S.
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
3/03/2006
12:27:35
| RE: Hughes cam
IP: Logged
Message:
I have a 390 stroker motor with Edelbrock RPM heads, air-gap intake and 750 mighty demon carb. I was running the RPM cam 234/244 dur @ .050 I switched to the Hughes 237/242 dur @ .050 cam, technically a larger cam. The Hughes cam idles better, seem to have more power and torque in the lower rpm range and also seems to have more top end power. This is a flat tappet cam, not a roller but I would expect similar results with the rollers. My local track opens this weekend so hopefully in a few weeks I will have a new best et to prove my claims.
Mike S.
91CC Carbed 390(hughes stroker)w/150 shot
|
bigdave
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
3/03/2006
20:18:42
| RE: Hughes cam
IP: Logged
Message:
I have one in my 97 3.9. I dont recall the # or size, I didnt go too radical with it. I am very impressed with it even now. It has been in about 8 months. It makes the engine wake up. I definately recommend Hughes.
|
| | P 1 |
|
Post a reply to this message:
Username Registration: Optional
All visitors are allowed to post messages
|
