| From | Message |
alex
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
3/29/2002
11:16:43
|
 Subject: RE: SRT~10 vs. Syclone
IP: Logged
Message:
Oh..... well, if you wanted opinions, mine is that a properly eqipped SRT-10 (15" wheels carrying Mickey ET Drags) would beat the Syclone if the S-15 was completely stock.
I have a buddy with a half-ton 2wd short-bed Ram V-10 (anyone remember the Hayes Hammer??) and it only runs mid 14's on street tires (that's the cast-iron version of the V-10). Give it traction, and it's a 13.90 daily driver with leather seats.
|
bfs
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
3/29/2002
17:39:05
| RE: SRT~10 vs. Syclone
IP: Logged
Message:
The cast iron V-10 doesn't compare to the viper
V-10. The truck motor gives up at least 140 horsepower and atleast 100 pounds(probably alot more).
|
kota on 20s
GenIII
3/29/2002
18:45:19
| RE: SRT~10 vs. Syclone
IP: Logged
Message:
yea, the 310hp iron V10 VS. the 450hp aluminum V10. BIG DIFFERANCE!
Eric, 98 5.2 5speed, K&N gen II, 50mm TB, 2bbl M-1, 1.7RR's, JBA ciramic headers, carsound cat, dumped gibson, and a lot more
|
Hersbird
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
3/29/2002
21:06:22
| RE: SRT~10 vs. Syclone
IP: Logged
Message:
And the new v-10 gets 500 ci (instead of 488) and 500 HP instead of the pervious vipers 450. Comparing it to the truck's iron v-10 is way off. The srt-10 even with serious traction problems will still smoke stock syclone.
|
alex
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
4/01/2002
08:11:21
| RE: SRT~10 vs. Syclone
IP: Logged
Message:
Yeah, the cast iron V-10 is a really stupid motor.
|
Matt
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
9/19/2006
23:57:02
| RE: SRT~10 vs. Syclone
IP: Logged
Message:
You guys are crazy. you ever rode in a syclone? Those things are the best designed trucks to run the quarter mile that ever came out. GM had their minds right on that one.
Think about it, a turbocharged 4.3, biggest motor that could be offered by the factory, coupled to a 700R4, which was the same transmission in the vette, 3.42 gear ratio, and sitting on all wheel drive.
These things would and still can outrun a vette in the 1/8 mile and sometimes even the 1/4. And your saying the SRT-10 will outrun it? Not a chance. Red light to red light, it don't stand a chance. There isn't a production machine built that can launch off the line like a syclone.
|
4.7onN20
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
9/20/2006
00:14:48
| RE: SRT~10 vs. Syclone
IP: Logged
Message:
Thanx for setting us straight. It took you long enough though. LOL
|
68 dart man
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
9/20/2006
16:32:11
| RE: SRT~10 vs. Syclone
IP: Logged
Message:
"There isn't a production machine built that can launch off the line like a syclone."
beg to differ..
68 ss dart and 68 ss barracudas.... enough said
cyclones are fast, but nothing to special. and to those who think i dont know what i am talking about i owned a semi- modded galant vr-4 which whooped on syclones, and my dart still pulls harder
|
Jerry
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
9/20/2006
18:05:12
| RE: SRT~10 vs. Syclone
IP: Logged
Message:
How can a 68 dart launch better than a turbo AWD truck? and most Syclones make around 320hp but where underrated (Vette rule). If the SRT-10 is faster than a low 13 then's it's faster it only took Dodge how long? The Typhoon/Syclone are still the badest trucks ever made.
|
N56629
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
9/20/2006
19:46:05
| RE: SRT~10 vs. Syclone
IP: Logged
Message:
Jerry, SS Darts ran high 10's to mid 11's in stock form with slicks. How hard can they launch?
|
| | <<Previous Page P 2 Next Page>> |
