Dodge Dakota ForumDodge Dakota PhotosDodgeDakota.net Membership
  Forums   Forum Tools
13:46:39 - 04/23/2024

V8 Dakotas
FromMessage
Mr.Sleepy
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

8/26/2003
11:53:37

Subject: 4.7, 5.2, 5.9 V8's Daks
IP: Logged

Message:
I'm not sure why you r/t's pick on 5.2's and 4.7's. And I'm not sure why 5.2's think they're so much better than 4.7's. All I know is that I've owned a v6 and a inline 4 and I've never been more happy to get back to a V8 no matter what size it is. Dakota owners have the distinction of being the only people to have midsize pickups with big engines, rangers don't even compare, and S-10s are mexican mobiles with playschool plastic toy looks. I guess since nothing compares to a V8 Dak we have no one else but ourselves to pick on...





pete
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


8/26/2003
15:42:34

RE: 4.7, 5.2, 5.9 V8's Daks
IP: Logged

Message:
lol...

its the pecking order my friend, 5.9 is bigger than 5.2 and 4.7.. 5.2 is bigger than 4.7. its kinda like the old joke:

"Why is 7 bigger than 6?

... because 7 8(ate) 9!!" har har... har
pete



GMAN
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


8/26/2003
15:57:07

RE: 4.7, 5.2, 5.9 V8's Daks
IP: Logged

Message:
I am sorry but a 4.7 5 speed and 5.9 are on a level playing field stock. The 5.2 is the odd one out with less power. The 4.7 is growing in popularity with more and more parts becoming available. I am a little partial because I have a 4.7.



318Dak
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


8/26/2003
17:08:30

RE: 4.7, 5.2, 5.9 V8's Daks
IP: Logged

Message:
5.2 has less power??? Yeah-that's what the last 4.7 guy said BEFORE I put an A$$ whippin on his ass by about 3 cars! The only reason the 4.7 is becomming more popular is because they don't put the 5.2 in Daks anymore you jacka$$!!



999.7653.2874
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


8/26/2003
17:18:59

RE: 4.7, 5.2, 5.9 V8's Daks
IP: Logged

Message:
318Dak, you are such an obnoxious idiot. The 5.2 was a horrible engine. And THAT is whey they don't put them in the Dak anymore.



hammers
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

8/26/2003
17:51:43

RE: 4.7, 5.2, 5.9 V8's Daks
IP: Logged

Message:
Yeah, sure. Thats why the 318 has been around for so long, I guess it really isn't a proven powerhouse huh? Not knockin down the 4.7 either but you really can't believe that the 5.2 isn't a good engine can ya?



Kowalski
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


8/26/2003
17:52:44

RE: 4.7, 5.2, 5.9 V8's Daks
IP: Logged

Message:
318Dak, where you at ? My 4.7 hasn't been beat by any 318s yet. I'm in western Mass.



318Dak
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


8/26/2003
17:59:35

RE: 4.7, 5.2, 5.9 V8's Daks
IP: Logged

Message:
MORE jealous 4.7 guys??? The 318 was one of the best motors Dodge ever built and will remain the best. The 4.7 will NEVER compare.My Dak has ran a 13.0 in cool weather ALL motor. Anyone got a 4.7 doing that?



GMAN
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


8/27/2003
07:07:29

RE: 4.7, 5.2, 5.9 V8's Daks
IP: Logged

Message:
Hey 318DAk I said STOCK jackass. I mean if you want to run your mouth about the work that you have done to your truck please do. What have you done to your truck? Because I dont care what 318 you have no STOCK 318 is going to run a 13. When you finish listing your mods go to my web page www.twinturbodakota.com



5.9 R/T
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


8/27/2003
08:58:08

RE: 4.7, 5.2, 5.9 V8's Daks
IP: Logged

Message:
GMAN

For a show quality truck I would lose the black door handles and get them painted. Where are the pics of your turbos on the site and what are your 1/4 mi times.



buks
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


8/27/2003
09:06:29

RE: 4.7, 5.2, 5.9 V8's Daks
IP: Logged

Message:
There's no replacement for displacement.

Can't beat $1.70 gas either, its great!!
ugh



JoshCP
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


8/27/2003
13:37:54

RE: 4.7, 5.2, 5.9 V8's Daks
IP: Logged

Message:
hmm i heard 318 were a poor design they had oil pump problems



nakonap
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

8/27/2003
14:46:52

RE: 4.7, 5.2, 5.9 V8's Daks
IP: Logged

Message:
the reason the 318 went into retirement is the same reason the 5.0 302 from ford went into the history books. look at emissions companys are now trying to build lower emision engines the 4.7 is a modular design and creates lower emisions which is why dodge went with is also why ford switched the the 4.6 and 5.4 and 6.8 ford went totally modular. the mopar 318 has been around for just about as long as the 302 both engines have perfomed exellent in 30 years. the time for change came and they made it to the modular engines. as far as power the 4.7 gain 5 hp over the 318 with a loss of 5 foot lbs of torque personnally i would rather have the torque. thats what gets u off the line.

nakonap

ps just to make u 4.7 guys mad the 318 is better



dweishaar
GenIII
 Email User Profile


8/27/2003
18:43:04

RE: 4.7, 5.2, 5.9 V8's Daks
IP: Logged

Message:
too bad the 5.2 only makes that +5 tq at 1500 rpms, wlile the 4.7 makes that -5 tq from 2500-6000rpms, with a slight dip at 4200 rpm. I personally would like to have power over 3500rpms than only 1000. maybe its cause i know how to read a dyno chart, and look at whole performance, not 2 stupid numbers.

The Baja Dak

318Dak
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


8/27/2003
19:27:09

RE: 4.7, 5.2, 5.9 V8's Daks
IP: Logged

Message:
BLAH BLAH BLAH- were you 4.7 guys saying something? I didn't think so. Nakonap- you are right- the 318 IS better. 4.7s SUCK A$$!!!!! And I didn't say my motor was stock you stupid D1CK! I said it was ALL MOTOR! That's another thing about you 4.7 guys-you're ALL F#CKING STUPID!



nakonap
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

8/27/2003
19:33:19

RE: 4.7, 5.2, 5.9 V8's Daks
IP: Logged

Message:
so what u said is that your glad u make 5tq less after 2500 rpms rather than not having it??

nakonap



dweishaar
GenIII
 Email User Profile


8/27/2003
20:26:32

RE: 4.7, 5.2, 5.9 V8's Daks
IP: Logged

Message:
Yeah....ever hear of a POWERBAND? usually pretty important, and the reason that a 4x4 auto 4.7 can take a 4x2 man 5.2. Tq does no good if the only time you have access to it is "off the line." If you have no high end power, your vehicle is gonna fall flat on it's face after 15mph.....hmmmmm....kinda like the 5.2

The Baja Dak

03Dak
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

8/27/2003
20:48:32

RE: 4.7, 5.2, 5.9 V8's Daks
IP: Logged

Message:
That is funny about the twin turbo 4.7. To THIS DATE I have seen no pics of the engine itself or any said turbo's!

That aside, the 318 was and is a bad ass motor and I never knew of any bad oil pump because I have driven 318's with 200 to 300K miles on them stock.

The 4.7 is a great engine so far, and technolodgy RULES and eventually the 4.7 will be making loads more power than it does now.

I have a 4.7 4X4 Quad Cab, tow package, etc. It runs pretty damn good and pulls my trailer with 2 quads no problem and has kicked some RICER ass a few times as well. Since I have a 4.7, I'm all for advancements and an increasing demand for performance parts.




nakonap
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

8/28/2003
14:55:22

RE: 4.7, 5.2, 5.9 V8's Daks
IP: Logged

Message:
wow u really u get pretty uptight there. well my 5.2 doesnt fall on its face and has never lost andy power at 15 mph i dont know where u come up with this stuff but it is amusing

nakonap



dweishaar
GenIII
 Email User Profile


8/28/2003
15:32:31

RE: 4.7, 5.2, 5.9 V8's Daks
IP: Logged

Message:
Where did I come up with this....hmmmm....let me think.....oh yeah, now I remember, cause I have a 1995 5.2 and a 2001 4.7

The Baja Dak

nakonap
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

8/28/2003
20:13:45

RE: 4.7, 5.2, 5.9 V8's Daks
IP: Logged

Message:
wow a 95 i have a 99 and never have i seen any loss of power at 15mph.

nakonap



   P 1 Next Page>>


 



Home | Forums | Members | Pictures | Contact Us

This site is in no way affiliated with Chrysler or any of its subsidiaries.